Category Archives: Law

Group-home Debate in NH Focuses on Those With Brain Disorders

Elderly man with walker, young woman wearing helmet, and caregiver talking outside a blue assisted living home

New Hampshire’s group homes for people with brain injuries and developmental disabilities are getting new legislative scrutiny: Gov. Kelly Ayotte signed House Bill 1763 into law on June 19, 2026, creating a committee to study how these residences are sited, built and maintained statewide, and whether siting disputes push vulnerable residents from needed care.

The panel, which was formed after neighbors in towns like Bow objected to state-backed homes appearing without notice, must report findings by Nov. 1, 2026. Sponsor Rep. Mike Drago said “residents feel blindsided” when facilities open unannounced. Disability advocate Lisa Beaudoin countered that “it is perfectly safe to have people with developmental disabilities in one’s neighborhood.” More so, advocates state that it is needed, as New Hampshire’s estimated 2,000 residents with acquired brain disorders rely on such housing to stay near family and services.

New Hampshire isn’t first to grapple with this tension. California has guaranteed small group homes equal footing with single-family houses since 1978. Connecticut adopted similar zoning-parity protections around 1980, later adding density limits after litigation. New York took a study-first approach in 2025, forming a working group on group-home families – a path New Hampshire now follows, as well.

Update: Mercury on the Mind

Industrial refinery at sunset with a yellow danger sign warning of mercury area and hazardous chemicals

Mercury is a potent neurotoxin. It is particularly dangerous for pregnant women and young children. As a 2018 TBI on the Hill piece noted, mercury exposure “may delay developmental milestones” in fetuses and children, and acute poisoning can bring tremors, slurred speech, and hallucinations.

The EPA finalized the 2012 Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, targeting coal- and oil-fired power plants. In 2024, these standards were tightened by Congress. Supporters of this heightening of standards argued that the tighter limits reduced toxic exposures tied to neurological harm. Critics countered that by 2021 mercury emissions were already down 90% from pre-2012 levels, and the 2024 update’s compliance costs outweighed its measurable benefits.

In February 2026, the EPA repealed the 2024 update, reverting to 2012 standards. In turn, on April 27, 2026, Senator Whitehouse (RI) introduced S.J.188 to reinstate 2024 standards, which would nullify the presidential proclamation from earlier this year. When the Act went to the Senate floor on June 3, 2026, the resolution failed 46-53, with voting falling in party lines, as they considered (1) Did the 2024 rule cause unnecessary economic stress on the industry, costs that are then passed on to the consumer”, and/or (2) Are the brain-protective regulations too great for the government to ignore?

FY27 Defense Bill Takes Aim at Military Brain Injuries

Stacks of defense budget documents laid out on a table with the U.S. Capitol building in the background at dusk

The Fiscal Year 2027 National Defense Appropriations Act advances several significant provisions for service members living with traumatic brain injury, moving through both chambers of Congress with bipartisan momentum this June.

The Senate Armed Services Committee approved S. 4784 on June 10 after a three-day markup. The bill includes a provision “requiring the Secretary of Defense to provide a briefing on the feasibility of regular cognitive testing and establishing blast overpressure and TBI logs, and encouraging DoD to approach brain health, blast overpressure exposure tracking, and suicide risk analysis as force health protection.” Additionally, it includes “the provision of training to the armed forces of partner nations in the Indo-Pacific and Arctic regions in the following areas: (A) Health effects and medical response related to chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive weapons, (B) Trauma care, (C) Preventive medicine and infectious disease, (D) Post-traumatic stress disorder, (E) Suicide prevention, (F) Traumatic brain injury, (G) Medical and health intelligence, (H) Health policy and administration.”

The House version, H.R. 8800, passed committee 44-12 and includes a section that would create a working group to develop an AI-driven digital strategy for treating brain injuries, and $7.5 million for a Cognitive Performance Enhancement Program for Special Operations Forces. H.R. 8800 has not yet received a floor vote.

The Biggest Veterans Bill in Years Buries a Tinnitus Trap

U.S. flag waving with Capitol building and two military personnel silhouette, text about Veterans Act 2026

House Veterans’ Affairs Chairman Mike Bost (IL) and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Chairman Jerry Moran (KS) introduced the Take Care of America’s Veterans Act (H.R. 9237/S. 4744) on June 10, 2026. This new 554-page, 62-page bill includes many sections that affect the brain injured from multiple angles:

Led by Rep. Jack Bergman (MI), a retired Marine general, and Rep. Sarah Elfreth (MD), the BEACON Act provision authorizes roughly $60 million for VA grants targeting non-pharmacological treatments for mild-to-moderate TBI. The Precision Brain Health Research Act, championed by Sen. Jerry Moran and Sen. Angus King (ME), directs a 10-year VA research plan on repetitive low-level blast injuries. The bill’s TBI provision includes A Blast Overpressure Task Force and HBOT reporting requirement, from Rep. Gregory Murphy (NC). A catastrophic-disability supplement of $833/month would benefit many severe TBI cases.

Furthermore, the package includes the Major Richard Star Act, the Love Lives On Act, and the Veterans’ ACCESS Act, among others. Rep. Gus Bilirakis (FL), a Congressional Brain Injury Task Force member, is among 20 House cosponsors; Senate cosponsors are John Boozman (AR) and Kevin Cramer (ND).

While the bill may appear wholly beneficial, it’s controversial because it offsets costs by reclassifying tinnitus – often a TBI symptom – as a derivative condition. (A derivative condition refers to a medical, legal, or mathematical situation that results directly from a pre-existing or primary cause.) This new classification would eliminate its standalone VA rating and data shows that it could potentially cut $57 billion in benefits for 1.5 million veterans.

NJ Lawmakers Push Bill to Catch Brain Injuries Before They Become Criminal Records

Nearly one in five incarcerated adolescents have a clinically significant brain injury. Most, however, are never diagnosed. New Jersey lawmakers want to change that.

Assembly bill A5104 (introduced May 18, 2026) and its Senate companion S4112 (introduced May 4, 2026) would establish a Brain Injury Screening and Education Program within the Department of Children and Families, targeting children and specific young adults ages 5 to 21, who are in or at risk of entering the mental-health or juvenile-justice systems. The program would deploy validated screening tools, train judges, educators, law enforcement, and facility staff, and fund public outreach on the link between undiagnosed brain injury and delinquency. As stated in the bill’s text, the goal is to “prevent admissions to psychiatric hospitals and reduce the recidivism rates of juveniles adjudicated delinquent.”

Committee hearing on Juvenile Brain Injury Bill in State House chamber with legislators reviewing documents

Prime sponsor Assemblyman Sterley Stanley is joined in the Senate by Patrick Diegnan, whose history of support for the brain injury committee includes championing New Jersey’s 2010 student-athlete concussion law and earning the Brain Injury Alliance’s Brady Award for Public Service in 2019. Bipartisan Senate co-sponsors are Angela McKnight and Owen Henry.

As of June 2026, no other state has enacted a comparable statutory youth program, making New Jersey a potential national first.

Georgia’s Lifeline for Brain Injured Officers

When a law enforcement officer suffers a catastrophic brain injury in the line of duty, the injury itself can make it nearly impossible to ask for help. Georgia Governor Brian Kemp addressed that cruel reality on May 6, 2026, signing House Bill 1128.

Sponsored by Representative Devan Seabaugh and a stated legislative priority of the Kemp administration, HB 1128 allows for a one-time reopening of the application window for officers who have sustained brain injuries to reapply for these benefits. It also amends Georgia code so that legal guardians are notified of those benefits. The Georgia State Indemnification Fund can pay up to $150,000 for brain damage suffered in the line of duty.

“The Kemp family will always back the blue, and I’m proud to sign legislation today that ensures they are supported throughout their careers of service and into retirement,” Governor Kemp said.

Georgia State Patrol police SUV with blue and silver color scheme and state insignia

The bill corrects a painful catch-22 in which a brain injury can strip an officer of the very cognitive capacity needed to file a claim before a 24-month deadline expires. HB 1128 creates a special application window from July 1, 2026, to August 1, 2026, for public safety officers who suffered total permanent disability due to brain damage sustained in the line of duty on or before July 1, 2024, and whose capacity to apply was impaired by the injury. Unfortunately, some first responders didn’t previously know that they were eligible, which caused many to miss out on this money.

(Kemp has also championed related causes, as the same day he signed “Rio’s Law,” mandating autism-recognition training for police officers. In 2025, he signed the Dignity and Pay Act, which phased out subminimum wages for workers with disabilities. He also signed the GAME Act, in 2024, establishing a statewide framework to recruit and retain employees with disabilities in state government.)

VT Acknowledges Your Brain Has Rights

Vermont state flag flying on a pole with mountainous landscape in background

When Vermont Governor Phil Scott signed H.814 into law on May 18, 2026, it marked a quiet but historic moment: every Vermonter gained a legal right to the privacy of their own mind. For the brain injury community, which is a population that increasingly relies on brain-computer interfaces, AI-powered rehabilitation tools, and wearable neurotechnology, the law provides a crucial layer of protection for some of the most intimate data imaginable.

Formally titled “An act relating to neurological rights and the use of artificial intelligence technology in health and human services,” H.814 takes effect July 1, 2026. The bill legally recognizes what should already be commonsense: every Vermonter has a right to “mental and neural data privacy,” “the freedom of thought,” and protection from “unauthorized access to or manipulation of an individual’s brain activity.” For those with brain injuries who depend on neurotechnology for communication, mobility, or cognitive support, that last phrase is a safeguard for the data generated at the most vulnerable intersection of their lives.

With this bill, Vermont joins Colorado, California, Montana, and Connecticut, though each of which has taken a distinct approach to neurological privacy. Colorado and California moved first in 2024, amending existing consumer privacy statutes to classify neural data as sensitive personal information. Montana went further with a standalone law amending its Genetic Information Privacy Act, requiring robust consent and uniquely prohibiting the storage of neural data in U.S.-sanctioned countries. Connecticut’s 2025 amendment was narrower, covering only the central nervous system. Vermont’s law aligns most closely with Connecticut’s, in that it establishes specific rights, while directing the state’s AI Advisory Council to develop further ethical guidelines, which extends through 2030.

Sponsored by State Representative Brian Cina, a clinical social worker, Vermont’s new legislation, and beyond the aforementioned five states that have similar laws, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Illinois, and New York are currently advancing similar bills. For the brain injury community, the question is no longer whether neurotechnology will be part of care and recovery, as it already is. The question is whether the law will keep pace.

The Chemical Time Bomb in Orange County

Workers in high-visibility vests wearing masks walking in a dusty warehouse near caution-taped barrels

A catastrophic chemical emergency has engulfed Orange County, California, forcing more than 50,000 residents to flee after a massive tank of methyl methacrylate ruptured at the GKN Aerospace facility in Garden Grove. Governor Gavin Newsom declared a state of emergency. President Trump also approved of Newsom’s request for federal aid, unlocking critical FEMA resources to help stabilize the crisis.

What many people don’t realize is that many chemicals, including methyl methacrylate, don’t just threaten the lungs. They also target the brain. Research published on NIH’s PubMed has found that methyl methacrylate causes measurable neurological deficits in exposed industrial workers, impairing memory, learning, and movement. One study documented that vapor exposure depressed electrical activity in the hippocampus, the brain’s memory center. The neurological symptoms of exposure, like headaches, lethargy, and a heavy, numb sensation in the limbs, can take days or weeks to appear.

As research further reveals, chronic exposure can cause degenerative changes in the brain and permanent nerve damage. Children, the elderly, and those with respiratory conditions face the greatest risk. As Garden Grove begins to recover, the invisible injury to thousands of brains is only beginning to unfold.

Workers in high-visibility vests wearing masks walking in a dusty warehouse near caution-taped barrels

This concern over industrial chemical dust is not new. California already has the strictest regulations on chemical plants and manufacturers of any state. Proposition 65 states that these companies must provide public warnings if they emit or use hundreds of chemicals linked to cancer or reproductive harm. Beyond just being one of the first states to mandate regulations, New Jersey also imposes some of the most rigorous chemical safety and security standards. Additionally, with the Matt Haller Act, Illinois enforces some of the strictest emission regulations. As Illinois Senator Dick Durbin captured in a 2017 letter addressed to the CDC Director: “It is clear that public exposure to [industrial chemical] dust can lead to serious health, safety, and environmental issues.”

Congress Seeks to Declare Stroke a National Health Crisis

Stroke emergency awareness infographic with F.A.S.T. signs and emergency contact instructions

“Recognizing stroke as a national health crisis requiring immediate, coordinated Federal action.” – So reads the heading of H.R. 1287, introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on May 14, 2026, during American Stroke Month. “Whereas time is critical in acute stroke care, and for every minute of treatment delay, nearly 2,000,000 neurons are at risk of permanent damage,” it continues.

Sponsored by Rep. George Latimer (NY), and co-sponsored by Rep. Debbie Dingell (MI), this resolution was promptly referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, where it awaits further action. The Dingell family has a long legislative history related to brain injury. Ms. Dingell’s late husband, Rep. John Dingell, former chair of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, submitted a committee report on the Stroke Treatment and Ongoing Prevention Act to the 110th Congress. That legislation strengthened stroke education, prevention, and treatment programs. Ms. Dingell has since supported the brain-injured community, through such actions as sponsoring the Better Care Better Jobs Act of 2023.

No Congressional Urge to Move BACK HOME

Inmates in prison uniforms in a common room with correctional officers and a sign reading 'TBI Support Group – 2:00 PM'

An estimated 107,400 veterans are serving time in state or federal prison, many of whom may carry wounds that no one can see. Combat exposure-associated mental and physical consequences including traumatic brain injury, PTSD, and mood disorders, are unfortunately directly linked to a greater likelihood of criminal justice involvement among veterans. Currently, by law, the VA cannot provide hospital or outpatient care to incarcerated veterans because penal institutions are legally obligated to furnish inmate healthcare. Bipartisan legislation aims to break that cycle.

The Get Justice-Involved Veterans Behavioral Assistance and Care for Key Health Outcomes to Maintain Empowerment (BACK HOME) Act, was introduced by Senators Angus King (ME) and Pete Ricketts (NE), along with Representatives Herb Conaway (NJ) and Morgan Luttrell (TX). The bill, S. 4162 and H.R. 8044, would create a VA pilot program to furnish mental health services to incarcerated veterans, prioritizing those with service-connected TBI, PTSD, or military sexual trauma. It would also ensure automatic resumption of disability compensation payments upon a veteran’s release from incarceration.

Logos of veteran associations and psychological associations side by side

“The Get Justice-Involved Veterans BACK HOME Act is about closing a dangerous gap in care by ensuring that justice-involved veterans can still access the mental health services they need to heal, rebuild, and successfully reenter their communities,” said Senator King. Congressman Conaway, a physician himself, added: “The Get Justice-Involved Veterans BACK HOME Act is about closing a dangerous gap in care by ensuring that justice-involved veterans can still access the mental health services they need to heal, rebuild, and successfully reenter their communities.”

The legislation is supported by the American Legion, Vietnam Veterans of America, the American Psychological Association, and the American Psychiatric Association.  Unfortunately, there has been no action on either the Senate or House BACK HOME Acts since their respective  introductions on March 23, 2026, and March 24, 2026.