Category Archives: Federal Law

Brain Injury in Blue

While citizen brain injuries from police interactions are prominent in the news, galvanizing the “Defund the Police” movement, they remain rare—occurring in just 0.36% of encounters according to 2024 data from one major US city. Officers face greater risks. Across the pond, a 2025 University of Exeter study highlighted the problem: “Police officers face twice the risk of traumatic brain injuries and PTSD.”  An August 2024 Ohio State University study found 30% of law enforcement officers are injured on duty. Reporting on this study, the Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation May/June edition states that, “[Head injuries] are prevalent in LEOs, which may have consequences for their performance, well-being, and career longevity. PTSD and depressive symptoms are higher in those with a HI history, suggesting LEOs need better traumatic brain injury and mental health resources.”

For police officers, brain injuries are primarily sustained from assaults, vehicle crashes, and falls, and can have horrific outcomes. Ferguson, MO Officer Travis Brown exemplifies the danger of the myriad of anti-law enforcement protests: struck during a 2024 protest, he remained unable to walk or talk nearly a year later. Additionally, in a September 5, 2025 article, ‘Something Is Wrong With My Brain’, the New York Times reported on Brent Simpson, the first police officer known to have CTE.

Congress has responded with the TBI and PTSD Law Enforcement Training Act, signed into law in August 2024. Led by Rep. Don Bacon and the late Rep. Bill Pascrell Jr. of the Congressional Brain Injury Task Force, this legislation mandates CDC studies on first responder concussions and crisis intervention training, allotting $270 million over five years for training and research. Mick McHale, President, National Association of Police Organizations (NAPO) said, in relation to protecting the police, “This legislation also recognizes that law enforcement and first responders are among those in our communities who suffer from these afflictions and requires the CDC to do a study on the prevalence of TBI and PTSD in the profession. We thank [senators] for championing this legislation and… [their] support of the law enforcement community.”

Thankfully, officers can and do protect themselves through ballistic helmets, baseline concussion testing, and return-to-duty protocols following head impacts. More so, additional research likely will be a benefit, assuming that it results in positive action.

Brain Injury Bill Returns After 2024 Setback

On September 24, 2025, S.2898 – Dennis John Benigno Traumatic Brain Injury Program Reauthorization Act of 2025 was introduced to the Senate. Sponsored by Senator Markwayne Mullin (OK), the legislation seeks to reauthorize federal grant programs providing care and resources for individuals with traumatic brain injuries through 2030, including funding for state partnership grants, protection systems, and CDC research.

Sen. Andy Kim (NJ), one of the bills bipartisan co-sponsors, says that he considers it a privilege to advance legislation that supports a cause that was so important to late Congressman Bill Pascrell (NJ), his friend and a staunch champion of TBI issues. (Kim’s extensive work with veterans, some of whom suffer traumatic brain injuries, also deepens his understanding of the issue’s severity.)

The current bill, named for a Clifton, NJ resident who was struck by a car as a pedestrian, essentially reintroduces the 2024 legislation. That bill passed Senate committee overwhelmingly but was unexpectedly removed from a December continuing resolution. This new bill, S.2898, preserves much of the 2024 bill while extending authorization through 2030 and reducing state matching requirements, making federal funding more accessible. The last action taken on the bill was on October 8, 2025, when a star print was ordered on the bill. According to congressional diction, “star prints are corrected re-prints of congressional publications.”

Big Beautiful Bill Controversy Obscures Opportunity for the Disabled

Self-identified as one of his signature achievements, President Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” was signed July 4, 2025. Since this time, H.R. 1 has generated widespread criticism from the news media.  The Atlantic described it as “A Big, Bad, Very Ugly Bill,” while ABC News reported that “two-thirds of the public view the ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’ legislation unfavorably.” While some of this criticism may be legitimate, the bill also offers opportunities for Americans with disabilities despite concerning cuts to social programs.

The legislation reduces SNAP funding by $186 billion through 2034 and implements stricter work requirements and eligibility verification for Medicaid, both of which could potentially affect millions of disabled Americans. However, the bill notably leaves Medicare largely unchanged, preserving this critical healthcare program for seniors and people with disabilities.

The legislation’s most transformative provision dramatically expands ABLE (Achieving a Better Life Experience) savings accounts, allowing people whose disability was diagnosed before age 46 to qualify, up from age 26. This change will enable an estimated 15 million Americans with disabilities to access tax-advantaged savings accounts without jeopardizing government benefits like Medicaid and Social Security.

The bill makes permanent several tax advantages, including 529-to-ABLE rollovers and expanded saver’s credits. As reported by CNBC, Charlie Massimo, a financial advisor and father of two sons with autism, says, “This is a game changer. For the first time, millions of Americans with disabilities will have access to the same kind of tax-advantaged wealth-building accounts most families already have.” Geneva Dickerson, who cares for her disabled brother, sees the potential: “With an account like the ABLE account, he can use those funds to pay for more speech therapy or physical therapy if insurance doesn’t cover it.”

While controversial aspects of the bill deserve scrutiny, the ABLE expansion represents the most significant advancement in disability financial inclusion in over a decade, offering unprecedented opportunities for financial security and independence.

H.R.1 – One Big Beautiful Bill Act: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/1

ABLE: https://www.ablenrc.org/

Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act Targets Brain Injury Prevention

Congressional lawmakers have introduced the Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act to strengthen fighter safety protections. Representatives Brian Jack (GA) and Sharice Davids (KS) introduced this legislation in July 2025, building upon the Professional Boxing Safety Act of 1996.

The timing coincides with devastating losses in Tokyo, where Shigetoshi Kotari and Hiromasa Urakawa, both 28, died from subdural hematomas after competing on the same card at Korakuen Hall on August 2. Both fighters collapsed following their matches and underwent emergency brain surgery but died days later. Japan’s Boxing Commission subsequently reduced championship fights from 12 to 10 rounds.

The new legislation enhances the original Muhammad Ali Boxing Reform Act, enacted in 2000, which primarily addressed financial protections. This revival focuses heavily on medical safety, mandating comprehensive brain imaging including MRIs every three years and increased testing frequency after knockouts.

The lawmakers cite concerns about brain trauma in combat sports, with former MMA fighter Congresswoman Davids drawing from personal experience about ring dangers. The World Boxing Organization, a major international sanctioning body governing professional boxing globally, endorses these enhanced safety protocols to protect fighter welfare.

TBI & PTSD Treatment Gains Congressional Momentum

Congressional efforts to expand hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) access for veterans with traumatic brain injuries and PTSD are advancing through multiple legislative channels in 2025.

Congressman Andy Biggs (AZ) reintroduced H.R. 72, the TBI and PTSD Treatment Act, on January 3, 2025, alongside co-sponsors Representative Elijah Crane (AZ) and Representative Paul Gosar (AZ). The bill was referred to the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee and subsequently to the Subcommittee on Health on February 6, 2025.

Additionally, Congressman Greg Murphy (NC) championed H.R. 1336, the Veterans National Traumatic Brain Injury Treatment Act, which successfully passed the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee on May 6, 2025. This bipartisan legislation establishes a pilot program for HBOT treatment and garnered support from twelve co-sponsors across party lines.

Both bills target the veteran suicide epidemic, with over 17 veterans lost daily. HBOT accelerates brain healing by delivering elevated oxygen to damaged tissue, with studies showing significant PTSD symptom reduction within four weeks of treatment.

The legislation aims to remove VA bureaucratic barriers and provide veterans additional treatment options beyond traditional therapies, representing a critical step toward addressing the mental health crisis affecting America’s veterans.

Sit Down and Breathe

Pandemic Accountability

About seven months ago, the U.S. government declared the COVID pandemic “over”.  As part of going forward, on May 9th, 2023, President Biden signed an Executive Order titled, “Moving Beyond COVID-⁠19 Vaccination Requirements for Federal Workers.”  Federal workers previously were required to get the COVID vaccine.  Currently, the vast majority of Americans walk in public without masks or fear.  However, the repercussions of government policies, actions and opinions about COVID-19 linger for some Americans.

Millions of people, in America and beyond, were initially eager to receive the vaccine shot, after their lives had been essentially halted for months due to the unforeseen COVID virus.  Before taking the jab, neither American citizens nor the government had information regarding its long-term effects. Soon after, though, we all became better educated on the topic.  “It was like playing Russian roulette,” said a father about the COVID-19 vaccine.  His previously healthy son died after receiving a dose of the Pfizer vaccine in April 2021.  In Louisiana, another such calamity occurred, this time with the Johnson & Johnson COVID vaccine.  The healthy 16-year-old woman who received the vaccine shot in April 2021 was left with a brain injury.  “Now, after three brain surgeries and thousands of hours of physical therapy, she struggles to walk, write, and care for herself,” says the lawsuit, filed in Louisiana, about the vaccine’s lifelong consequences for this woman. 

Last year, the federal government even acknowledged the connection between COVID vaccines and brain damage, noting that, “There is a greater than expected occurrence of severe neurological adverse events…following different kinds of COVID-19 vaccinations,” in the aptly titled 2022 report, Neurological Complications Following COVID-19 Vaccination.   Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer and others considered to be Big Pharma cannot, under law, be sued for these outcomes and, ultimately, Big Pharma did not mandate the vaccine – that was the purview of the federal and state governments, as well as various individual organizations.  While negative outcomes from the COVID vaccine were rare, they occurred and someone should be held accountable.         

NOTE: Though I penned this article months ago, I never posted it on my site.  If more up-to-date information is available, related specifically to this topic, please comment below.

Call for More Studies, Not Solutions

At the start of 2019, Congress sought to showcase its “great concern” for brain injury, with Congresswoman Joyce Beatty’s (OH) introduction of H.R.280, the Concussion Awareness and Education Act of 2019.  Cosponsored by 36 others, the Bill seeks, “to provide for systemic research, treatment, awareness, and dissemination of information with respect to sports-related and other concussions.”  Specifically, it focuses on children, aged 5 to 21.  It is an admirable goal to care for America’s children, but just like similar bills that seem to go through Congress every year, it just calls for research.  Additionally, once introduced on January 8, the bill was referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, where it still sits without action.

Citizens have expressed their concern over what they see as a lack of concern for the youth, but stateside, similar government pseudo-action seems to be present.  For example, the Salt Lake Tribune wrote, “there’s a dirty little secret plaguing high school sports in Utah.”  According to the newspaper, that “dirty little secret” is the incidence of concussions in high school sports.  In Washington, S.R. 5238, which is currently being considered in State Congress, “would require UW Medicine to publish and maintain a website making… research available to parents,” – again, the government is proposing research, not action.  (Some states have taken legislative action, though, by eliminating certain sports and certain actions in sports.  A bill introduced to Congress in Maryland this month, for example, “would… prohibit cheerleaders age 12 and younger from engaging in aerial stunts.”)

As I have noted in the past, this heightened concern (and, perhaps, this seeming lack of federal action) may be the cause of the decreased sports enrollment in schools.  While that is unfortunate, a positive outcome of this current parental concern could be a heightened concern for sports safety from school districts.  Even without legal mandate, this could lead to a lower concussion percentage rate for the millions of American children who, theoretically, stay on the field and court.

A Broader Definition of Day Care

No one wants a life of twiddling their thumbs, with little to occupy their time.  For this reason, the concept of adult day programs was created.*  As the geriatric population becomes larger, the idea of providing appropriate funding to attend these adult day centers has become more popular.  This year, on January 8**, Rep. Barbara Lee (CA) introduced the Adult Day Center Enhancement Act to broaden the idea of who may benefit and should receive funding for adult day center attendance.  The purpose of the Act is to provide funding for, “a program that provides comprehensive and effective services to individuals living with neurological diseases or conditions… that may result in a functional or degenerative disability and to their family caregivers and that may assist participants.”  (This bill funds daytime assistance to the young adults who are disabled, however I can find no information regarding the age limits.)

Related to its assistance to the participant, “adult day programs can offer services, including medical care, rehabilitation therapies, dignified assistance with the activities of daily living, nutrition therapy, health monitoring, social interaction, stimulating activities, and transportation.”  First introduced in 2013, and re-introduced every other year thereafter, H.R. 320 seeks to maintain the quality of life of the disabled population.  As with inflation, the allowed funding will increase every year until 2023.  (The Veterans Home Adult Day Health Care Improvement Act, to which I assume partially refers to veterans with brain injuries, was signed into law on March 27, 2018.)

On January 8, the Adult Day Center Enhancement Act was referred to the House Committee of Energy and Commerce, of which Rep. Lee is a member.  (Last time the Act was introduced, it was referred to the Subcommittee on Health.)  Due to the shutdown, this bill currently has no co-sponsors nor does it have a summary on congress.gov.  Now that the shutdown is over and before the bill may be enacted, it must be evaluated by the Assistant Secretary of Aging.

* On some sites, I have found it titled “adult day care”.  However, it is generally titled “adult day programs” assumedly because “daycare” has a youth connotation.  If one is to think about it though, that inaccurately marks toddlers as the only segment of the population that needs activity during the day.

** I find it heartening that a bill was introduced in Congress during the partial shutdown, which officially began December 22, 2018.

Update: Bipartisan Appeal for Reauthorization of TBI Act

On Friday, December 21, 2018, “H.R. 6615, which reauthorizes appropriations for programs and activities relating to the study, prevention, and treatment of traumatic brain injury (TBI),” was signed into law by President Trump.  Officially called the Traumatic Brain Injury Program Reauthorization Act of 2018, the bill previously passed the House with a 353-6 margin and passed the Senate unanimously.  (Reauthorizations were also given to other key health bills, H.R.1222, the Congenital Heart Futures Reauthorization Act of 2017, and H.R. 1318, the Preventing Maternal Deaths Act of 2018.)

Earlier this month, Congressman Pascrell spoke of the bill in House, “Mr. Speaker, I rise to support H.R.6615… I would like to thank Chairman Walden and Ranking Member Pallone for their work to move this important legislation forward.”  Following being signed into law, Chairman Greg Walden (OR) said, “These bipartisan bills… represent a continuation of the hard work [the House Energy and Commerce Committee] has done this Congress to protect and improve the health of all Americans.  From reauthorizing programs so we can better treat and understand congenital heart defects to increasing our understanding of traumatic brain injury, to improving maternal health outcomes… these bipartisan bills will have a profound effect of the lives of children, families, and communities all across the country.”

 

Bipartisan Appeal for Reauthorization of TBI Act

The federal Traumatic Brain Injury Act provides many benefits to survivors.  For example, much of the research that I reference on this website is done by organizations funded through the Act.  When it was originally signed into law in 1996, the TBI Act defined its goals as to “identify methods of preventing traumatic brain injury; expand biomedical research efforts to prevent or minimize the severity of dysfunction as a result of such an injury; and to improve the delivery and quality of services through state demonstration projects.”  More than 20 years later, the basic goals of the bill remain the same.  However, every few years reauthorization is required, and new amendments are added.

This year, Congressman Bill Pascrell presented H.R. 6615 to the House for this reauthorization on July 26, 2018.  (Rep. Pascrell is the co-chair of the Congressional Brain Injury Task Force.  The bill was co-sponsored by the other co-chair of the Task Force Rep. Thomas Rooney (FL), and by Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (PA), Rep. Eleanor Holmes (DC), Rep. Steve Cohen (TN) and Rep. Brian Higgins (NY).)  “I am proud to introduce this critical bipartisan, bicameral reauthorization of the Traumatic Brain Injury Act,” Pascrell said.  In particular, the bill is seeking a $186,000 increase in the annual budget of the National Concussion Surveillance System.  (From $6,564,000 each fiscal year from 2015 through 2019 to $6,750,000 each fiscal year from 2019 through 2023, to perform aspects of data collection and evaluation.)  Established in 2016, NCSS seeks to, “determine the prevalence and incidence of concussion,” through such activities as household telephone surveys.  Additionally, the bill aims to increase the budget for state and federal research grants. 

This week H.R. 6615 passed the House and was sent to the Senate.  Termed S. 3657 in the Senate, the Traumatic Brain Injury Program Reauthorization Act of 2018 is sponsored by Sen. Orrin Hatch (UT).  (The fact that the main sponsor of the bill was Rep. Pascrell, a Democrat, in the House and Sen. Hatch, a Republican, in the Senate is further proof of its bipartisan appeal.)  As Hatch said, “We know TBI is a serious problem, but we fail to grasp its severity and scope. Our bill will change that… our legislation will extend important research, education, and advocacy efforts to help us better understand the nature of brain trauma and reduce the prevalence of these injuries going forward.”